The SIG charge reads “works with developers to guide the integration of authentication systems (such as Shibboleth,
OAUTH, InCommon) and authorization systems (Grouper) into the FOLIO platform. “
So far the SIG has focused on circ-related user management. Is it time to discuss the electronic resource access authentication issues? I imagine there would be a lot of overlap with Resource
Management SIG and I’m not sure where they are on this. Maybe Filip or Charlotte could advise.
Paula
From: user-mgmt@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org [mailto:user-mgmt@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Manly
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 9:52 AM
To: FOLIO User Management SIG <user-mgmt@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org>
Subject: What's next for UM-SIG?
Hi all,
It’s time to think about what’s next on the agenda for the UM-SIG. We seem to have run through all of the content where EBSCO/Indexdata are looking to us for answers for the moment.
One possibility that came up on this week’s call would be to talk about best practices around feeds of user data and user provisioning, to see if we could converge our various institutions’ approaches into something more standardized.
Another possibility is that we just go on hiatus for a while.
Thoughts/opinions/suggestions?
Coordinator, Library Systems
Cornell University Library Information Technologies
To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com