The team is working through the 3rd revision of his recommendations, which I’ll summarize below:

1) There would be 3 governing bodies associated with FOLIO:

a) Tech Steering Council: Essentially the Tech Council, with 3 changes:

ii) Members are elected by the community’s developers - i.e. a person has to have 3 pull requests that have been accepted and pulled into the master branch in order to vote.

iii) Membership is limited to 5. The chair is the person with the most votes.

b) Community Steering Council: Charge is to maintain a healthy, productive community ecosystem, policy, and collaboration for the FOLIO project.

i) This group resolves all community disputes, manages which SIGs or other councils exist, and generally manage the membership rules

ii) Also 5 people, also elected. Candidates must be active members of the community (developers, SIG members, etc.). A general election process.

c) Product Steering Committee: Charge is To maintain the FOLIO roadmap to reflect the best interests of librarians and users and to work with the engineering teams to deliver the roadmap as efficiently as possible.

i) Also a group of 5. Members are nominated by the CSC and voted on by existing PSC members. Must be active members of the community.

In addition to these groups Jono makes some recommendations about how OLF relates to FOLIO and what the role of the Executive Director of OLF is wrt to FOLIO. There is also a “Project Leader” role that is mentioned - I’m not clear quite yet how this leader role relates to the 3 councils.

The team of people I am working with are actively reviewing, commenting and questioning the stuff that Jono’s proposed. I don’t want to waste your time reviewing stuff that will likely change, so I won’t be asking you to review this 3rd edition. But when it gets closer to final I will.

In addition to leadership and governance Jono has made recommendations related to the Code review process.

This is where I would like to get your specific feedback.

I have copied the section of text from Jono’s document into this one:

I would like to get any of your thoughts and feedback on the Code Review Recommendations that Jono makes. He’s reviewed Github and drawn some conclusions. I have no idea if they are sound or accurate. This is why I’m asking for your input.

I will include this as an item on our agenda for tomorrow. I will ask you all to complete your review and commentary by next week’s meeting - November 6, 2019.