Hi Ann-Marie,
Your comments make me wonder about the process here, related to Jira in general and using Holly’s spreadsheet and requested review. As a PO, would you prefer that we put comments directly in Jira or put in the
spreadsheet and discuss them first within the SIG?
Kristin
From: folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org [mailto:folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org]
On Behalf Of Ann-Marie Breaux
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 12:56 PM
To: folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org
Subject: [folio-rm-t] RE: FOLIO Jira review for Resource Management
Hi Julie,
The Product Owner (Dennis Bridges for Acq) is usually in the best position to be able to explain the differences between various features and then clean up the description to make
everything more clear.
When I’m dealing with questions about a particular Jira ticket in the areas that I’m PO for, I find it most useful to have that conversation in the comments area of the ticket.
That way there’s a record of the discussion, which can be particularly helpful if one ticket is eventually closed as a duplicate, or rewritten to make it more distinct from the other one.
I’m not sure how much you have worked in Jira, but if you need any help with comments, I’m happy to show you – it would just take a few minutes. Dennis is traveling today, so may
not see your question in e-mail for a bit.
Now as to your question: I took at look at these, and at first glance, I’m not clear how they differ either. My guess is that they overlap or are duplicates, so one of each pair
can probably be closed. Ultimately it’s up to Dennis to make that decision or to differentiate them more clearly.
Thanks,
A-M
Ann-Marie Breaux
Vice President, Workflow Management Services
EBSCO Information Services
10 Estes Street
Ipswich, MA 01938
Mobile: +1-678-427-4875
From:
folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org>
On Behalf Of Julie Brannon
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 12:24 PM
To: folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org
Subject: [folio-rm-t] RE: FOLIO Jira review for Resource Management
CAUTION: External E-mail
Greetings RM SIG,
Here are two sets of items from the capacity planning feature list that seem to overlap based on the current JIRA description and Kristin suggested I share them with this group.
UXPROD-694:
CRUD Credit
UXPROD-783:
Ability to create a credit
How does 694 differ from 783? The full descriptions in JIRA didn't help me differentiate these two features - could they be merged/collapsed?
UXPROD-202:
Rollover Encumbrances into the next Fiscal Year
UXPROD-772:
Rollover encumbrances of the ledgers funds/budgets into a new Fiscal year
How does 202 differ from 783? Could these be merged/collapsed?
Thanks,
Julie
------------------
Julie Brannon
IT Business Analyst, Library Systems and Integration Support
Duke University, 030J Bostock Library
Box 90196
(919) 613-8632
Pronouns: she/her
Duke University Libraries value diversity of thought, perspective, experience, and background and are actively committed to a culture of inclusion and respect.
From:
folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org>
On Behalf Of Kristin Martin
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2019 11:49 PM
To: folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org
Subject: [folio-rm-t] FOLIO Jira review for Resource Management
Dear RM SIG,
Thanks for the interesting discussion on how to approach a review of Jira feature tickets to make sure that we are working on the items we all absolutely need. As we noted on Friday, although we all agree that having the SIG spent time
reviewing and understanding Jiras and the connection between Jiras and our discussions, exactly how we should go about doing this is tricky. I would ask for next week Friday that everyone do the following:
I would recommend setting aside a bit of time early in the week and start sharing questions directly in the spreadsheet or via this email list. We can use the questions to build our agenda for next Friday, and see how we like this process.
If we do fine Jiras that need refinement, splitting or updating, we then share the revised features with the FOLIO implementers for them to review their rankings. To do this I would probably communicate with the implementation group.
Thanks,
Kristin
Kristin E. Martin
Director of Technical Services
The University of Chicago Library
773-834-2702
------------------------------------------------------
You received this message because you are subscribed to OLE Mailing List "folio-rm-t".
To unsubscribe from this list and stop receiving emails from it, follow this link:
http://archives.simplelists.com.
To post to this group, send email to
folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <mailto:folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org%3E.
Visit this group at
https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org<https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org> .
------------------------------------------------------
You received this message because you are subscribed to OLE Mailing List "folio-rm-t".
To unsubscribe from this list and stop receiving emails from it, follow this link:
http://archives.simplelists.com.
To post to this group, send email to
folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <mailto:folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org>.
Visit this group at
https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org<https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org> .
------------------------------------------------------
You received this message because you are subscribed to OLE Mailing List "folio-rm-t".
To unsubscribe from this list and stop receiving emails from it, follow this link:
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=sTdWscCMzQvAwIJ5PUSpOwSjDlSrVPu2.
To post to this group, send email to
folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <mailto:folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org>.
Visit this group at
https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org<https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org> .