Greetings RM SIG,
Here are two sets of items from the capacity planning feature list that seem to overlap based on the current JIRA description and Kristin suggested I share them with this group.
UXPROD-694:
CRUD Credit
UXPROD-783:
Ability to create a credit
How does 694 differ from 783? The full descriptions in JIRA didn't help me differentiate these two features - could they be merged/collapsed?
UXPROD-202:
Rollover Encumbrances into the next Fiscal Year
UXPROD-772:
Rollover encumbrances of the ledgers funds/budgets into a new Fiscal year
How does 202 differ from 783? Could these be merged/collapsed?
Thanks,
Julie
------------------
Julie Brannon
IT Business Analyst, Library Systems and Integration Support
Duke University, 030J Bostock Library
Box 90196
(919) 613-8632
Pronouns: she/her
Duke University Libraries value diversity of thought, perspective, experience, and background and are actively committed to a culture of inclusion and respect.
From: folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org>
On Behalf Of Kristin Martin
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2019 11:49 PM
To: folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org
Subject: [folio-rm-t] FOLIO Jira review for Resource Management
Dear RM SIG,
Thanks for the interesting discussion on how to approach a review of Jira feature tickets to make sure that we are working on the items we all absolutely need. As we noted on Friday, although we all agree that having the SIG spent time
reviewing and understanding Jiras and the connection between Jiras and our discussions, exactly how we should go about doing this is tricky. I would ask for next week Friday that everyone do the following:
·
Look at the spreadsheet from capacity planning:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eHmRKUH2mzurOLL7iaaHV65qHpvGnyN8j5YNxocMUJ4/edit#gid=805143199
·
Focus on the areas under Resource Management
·
Is there a ticket that seems confusing to you? Are institutional rankings uneven or bifurcated? Is the institutional rank significantly different from the PO ranking? Does the ticket large and unsettled but you know we’ve had
SIG discussions?
I would recommend setting aside a bit of time early in the week and start sharing questions directly in the spreadsheet or via this email list. We can use the questions to build our agenda for next Friday, and see how we like this process.
If we do fine Jiras that need refinement, splitting or updating, we then share the revised features with the FOLIO implementers for them to review their rankings. To do this I would probably communicate with the implementation group.
Thanks,
Kristin
Kristin E. Martin
Director of Technical Services
The University of Chicago Library
773-834-2702
------------------------------------------------------
You received this message because you are subscribed to OLE Mailing List "folio-rm-t".
To unsubscribe from this list and stop receiving emails from it, follow this link:
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=d0sf0AutCVP5FxyTwS8bnAnCRBRZefVl.
To post to this group, send email to
folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <mailto:folio-rm-t@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org%3E.
Visit this group at
https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org<https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org> .