Hi Owen,

Sorry, for the confusion with the example –  I’m having trouble with Snaggit doing a scrolling capture so I just put together something that would fit on one screen.

You are correct, there is perpetual access wording in the base agreement. For us, we just removed the expression from the base agreement section so that you don’t see it and just have that replacement note in the appendix section. An alternative approach could be for us to leave the original wording in with the base agreement and add a note in the “internal note” section stating that the perpetual access terms are outdated. We could also have added a “replaced” qualifier.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

-Eric

From: Owen Stephens [mailto:owen@ostephens.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:29 AM
To: Hartnett, Eric J <ehartnett@library.tamu.edu>
Cc: folio-rm-erm@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Amendment terms

Thanks Eric,

In the case of this example I can see that the 'expression' from the appendix "Replaces section in base contract". Does this imply that there is (or could be) a "Perpetual Access" expression in the Service Agreement as well, and if so, how do you represent that there are two expressions that say different things about perpetual access?

Does that make sense as a question? I'm trying to understand if there is any system level understanding that the Amendment over-rules the Base Contract in some way?

Owen

Hartnett, Eric J wrote on 23/01/2019 15:20:

Hi everyone,

Following up on the discussion earlier – CORAL ties terms to the corresponding license/amendment (see the sample below) and I think it works well.

-Eric

Eric Hartnett
Director of Electronic Resources
Texas A&M University Libraries
(979) 845.0797

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=V1ztQJr9zcZApWIDmTXOgs144JjQpSxE

--

Sent from Postbox