Hi Jackie,
https://issues.folio.org/browse/UXPROD-86 has two parts: (1) display the effective call number string (prefix, call
nubmer, suffix, volume etc) on the Loans page and (2) support sorting of the Loans page by the call number sort code. Since the two features were combined into a single UXPROD, we can’t know whether the current rankings relate to one or both aspects of that
feature. It would be much cleaner if we just had institution ranks on UXPROD-2002.
Thanks much,
Cate
From: Jackie Gottlieb <jackie.gottlieb@duke.edu>
Sent: 12 November 2019 04:26 PM
To: metadata-mgmt-sig@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org; folio-ra@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org; Holly L. Mistlebauer <hlm7@cornell.edu>
Cc: Cate Boerema <cboerema@EBSCO.COM>; Laura Elisabeth Wright <lew235@cornell.edu>
Subject: RE: [Metadata Mgmt SIG] Institutional ranking of UXPROD-2002 - feature on Implementation of Normalized Call Number for Sorting
CAUTION: External E-mail
2002 was probably not ranked because it is documented as necessary in order to complete other MVP features. In fact,
https://issues.folio.org/browse/UXPROD-86 is blocked by 2002 which has been ranked by the institutions. What value does ranking an issue have when it has to be done in order for other issues to
be completed? If UXPROD-86 is ranked go-live AND is CAP-MVP and it is blocked by 1626 and 2002, then 1626 and 2002 need to also be CAP-MVP.
From:
metadata-mgmt-sig@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <metadata-mgmt-sig@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org>
On Behalf Of Charlotte Whitt
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 10:01 AM
To: folio-ra@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org;
metadata-mgmt-sig@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org; Holly L. Mistlebauer <hlm7@cornell.edu>
Cc: Cate Boerema <cboerema@EBSCO.COM>; Laura Elisabeth Wright <lew235@cornell.edu>
Subject: [Metadata Mgmt SIG] Institutional ranking of UXPROD-2002 - feature on Implementation of Normalized Call Number for Sorting
Hi RA-SIG and MM-SIG
We are going through the misc features on the `cap-MVP` plan, and now when we're getting closer to the feature freeze of Q4 2019, then we are reviewing also the institutions ranking of features being at risk for not being completed this quarter.
One of these features is:
UXPROD-2002 - Implement Normalized Call Number for Sorting.
This feature is only ranked by three libraries:
* Chalmers (Aut 2019)- NOT NEEDED
* Cornell (Sum 2020) - go-live
* GBV (Jan 2020): can wait - up to a quater after go-live
The total calculated rank by libraries at this point is: 15. The Cap Plan Rank is: 120.5
Status of the work is: lots of work has been done to get the requirements ready and planning of how to get Tod Olson (uChicago's) code integrated with FOLIO. The feature is dev-ready and may be picked up soon, but when looking at the calculated rank by the
libraries, then the feature stick out, as not being that highly ranked.
The low rank can be due to, that this feature is one of the latest features, created back in August 2019.
If you could ask your institutions to take a look at this feature, and rank it, that would help us with the planning of Q1 2020 dev work.
Thanks much.
Best Cate, Laura and Charlotte
--
Charlotte 🍋 Whitt
Senior Analyst. Product Owner
Index Data LLC
------------------------------------------------------
You received this message because you are subscribed to OLE Mailing List "metadata-mgmt-sig".
To unsubscribe from this list and stop receiving emails from it, follow this link:
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=yJsA8sPwSn5bGr2yPte5OtZvIiJRIZYx.
To post to this group, send email to
metadata-mgmt-sig@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org <mailto:metadata-mgmt-sig@ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org%3E.
Visit this group at
https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org<https://ole-lists.openlibraryfoundation.org> .